Report: Lebanon court rejects anti-gay law
Colin Stewart is a 45-year journalism veteran living in Southern…
A court in Lebanon has ruled that homosexuality is natural and is not a criminal offense. [Contrary to an earlier version of this article, the ruling was not made by the Supreme Court in Lebanon.]
For English-speakers, details of the ruling must await a translation of an Arabic-language account of the decision. But a dispatch from Human Rights Watch provides helpful information about the decision.
[There is no confirmation of a statement contained in an early account of the ruling, stating that the court’s ruling included a declaration that discrimination based on sexual orientation is illegal.]
For the particular case before the court, the ruling set aside Article 534 of the Lebanese Penal Code, which calls for a year in prison for men convicted of “sexual intercourse against nature.”
A separate French-language account of the court decision stated that a lower court in the Metn region east of Beirut ruled that Article 534 does not apply if homosexuality is exercised as a right and in a non-abusive way.
Last spring, the Lebanese Medical Association for Sexual Health (LebMASH) challenged Article 534, arguing that because “homosexuality is a natural variation of human sexuality,” it should be exempt from the law forbidding sexual intercourse “against nature.”
Related articles:
- Lebanon appeal: LGBT sexuality isn’t ‘against nature’
(May 2016, 76crimes.com)
- Report: Lebanon targets gay men in 3 raids, 45 arrests (August 2014, 76crimes.com)
- Anti-gay Lebanon: 27 arrests in raid on Turkish bath (August 2014, 76crimes.com)
- Lebanon’s anti-LGBT law is invalid, judge rules (March 2014, 76crimes.com)
- Report cites torture of Lebanon LGBTs, others; seeks reform (June 2013, 76crimes.com)
It was the single penal judge of the Metn not the Lebanese Supreme court
Thank you. I have corrected the earlier version.
— Colin Stewart, editor/publisher of this blog
So would it be possible to have a pride parade in lebanon or not?