Now Reading
Is harsh Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Law constitutional? Court is about to decide

Is harsh Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Law constitutional? Court is about to decide

Court skips oral arguments and courtroom theatrics over the Anti-Homosexuality Law


CLICK to receive an email notice of each new Erasing 76 Crimes article


Uganda's Constitutional Court begins deliberations on whether the Anti=Homosexuality Law of 2023 is constitutional. (Photo courtesy of Nicholas Opiyo / X)
Uganda’s Constitutional Court begins deliberations on whether the Anti=Homosexuality Law of 2023 is constitutional. (Photo courtesy of Nicholas Opiyo / X)

Uganda’s Constitutional Court today began its deliberations on a challenge to the nation’s harsh new Anti-Homosexuality Law, which carries the death penalty for some same-sex acts, a life sentence for consensual same-sex intercourse and 20 years in prison for “promoting” homosexuality.

Frank Mugisha and other human rights activists await action from the Constitutional Court. (Photo courtesy Nicholas Opiyo / X)
Frank Mugisha and other human rights activists await action from the Constitutional Court. (Photo courtesy Nicholas Opiyo / X)

After the law was signed into law by President Yoweri Museveni in May, the U.S. and the World Bank protested and began imposing sanctions.

In a brief court session today, a panel of five judges received written submissions both from opponents and from supporters of the law.

Petitioners were told they would be notified when a ruling was ready.

Human rights attorney Nicholas Opiyo commented:

See Also
Graphic from the 2020 report “Hate Speech Spreads Like Wildfire” on hate speech in social media in the Middle East and North Africa.

The choice of the court to hear and determine the challenge to Uganda’s anti-homosexuality by way of written submissions rather than oral presentation in court may have surprised many.

But the overall consideration- and many will disagree – was to avoid the theatrical intention of some of the people admitted into the process- whose only objective appeared to be using the court as a platform to raise money & profile.

[The court recently allowed prominent anti-gay Pastor Martin Ssempa to join the proceeding in defense of the law.]

 

View Comment (1)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

© 2022 ERASING 76CRIMES
Scroll To Top

Discover more from Erasing 76 Crimes

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading