Commentary: Help LGBT Africans by cutting aid to anti-gay Tanzania

Many African LGBT activists urge Western donors not to cut off aid to Tanzania or other homophobic African nations, even when those countries launch anti-gay crackdowns. But not everyone agrees.

From the African Human Rights Media Network

Joseph Saidi in happier times.
Joseph Saidi before he was tortured and fled to Sweden.

Anthony Oluoch, program manager for the LGBT+ rights organization Pan Africa ILGA, made the case for continued foreign aid to Tanzania in a statement titled “Withholding aid to Tanzania is a bad idea: LGBT+ Tanzanians will lose out and become scapegoats if donors cut aid.

That statement was endorsed by representatives of 10 organizations in Tanzania, where repression of LGBT citizens has been increasing since John Magufuli was elected president in 2015.

His statement was published after Denmark cut off foreign aid to Tanzania ($9.8 million a year),Canadian officials said they were considering taking the same step ($125 million a year), and the World Bank suspended its missions to Tanzania.

Oluoch’s full statement was published on this blog under the headline “Commentary: Aid cut would make gay Tanzanians into scapegoats.”

East African LGBT rights activist Joseph Saidi disagrees. Having fled from violence in Africa, Saidi wrote from Sweden to challenge Oluoch’s position. His response began as a comment on this blog’s article about the Pan-Africa ILGA statement.

Saidi writes:

As a victim of the anti-gay law in Uganda in 2014, I was arrested, beaten and tortured by the police and attacked by mob justice. That why I don’t agree with this message.

I think the only way to improve the lives of LGBT people in Tanzania is to continue cutting aid.

I call all Western countries to cut their aid to Tanzania, even cut diplomatic relations if possible.

LGBTI rights are human rights. We have been treated like animals, killed and tortured. Enough is enough.

The change is now and not tomorrow. There is no more life to lose.

Saidi was the founder of the LGBT advocacy group Rainbow Sunrise Mapambazuko in the eastern section of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. He is currently a member of RFSL, the Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer Rights.

The position of RFSL on international aid is closer to Oluoch’s than to Saidi’s.

RFSL states on its website:

A few weeks ago, the governor of Dar Es Salaam in Tanzania, threatened to round up and arrest LGBTQ people, calling on the public to identify and report anyone they knew to be LGBTQ. These statements have escalated fear among the LGBTQ community and contributed to an already deteriorating human rights environment for LGBTQ people across the country. There has since been much international attention paid to the situation in Tanzania.

Tanzania continues to criminalize homosexual acts with up to 30 years in prison through a British colonial-era anti-sodomy law. The statements made by the governor are not isolated and are part of the growing crackdown against LGBTQ people, and a larger trend of repression against journalists, political opposition leaders, and a shrinking space for civil society in the country.

While RFSL does not have any formal partnerships with LGBTQ organisations in Tanzania, we have closely followed the development of events through our contacts, cooperation with organisations in the region, and through other organisations that work directly with LGBTQ groups in the country.

State sanctioned violence and discrimination against LGBTQ people is a human rights violation. We at RFSL, along with many people in Sweden, are seriously concerned by the statements of the governor of Dar Es Salaam and the worsening situation for LGBTQ Tanzanians.

Paul Makonda, the regional commissioner of Dar es Salaam, launched Tanzania's latest anti-gay panic by announcing plans for a gay "round-up." (Photo courtesy of The Citizen)
Paul Makonda, the regional commissioner of Dar es Salaam, launched Tanzania’s latest anti-gay panic by announcing plans for a gay “round-up.” (Photo courtesy of The Citizen)

These events, specifically the governor’s statements, have led to a debate on whether countries which currently provide developmental assistance to Tanzania should respond by withdrawing aid to the country.  These conversations have taken place in the media within the international community in Sweden, as well as in other donor countries such as Denmark, Norway, and Canada.

LGBTQ organizations in Tanzania however are voicing that there are potential risks involved in such actions from Sweden and other donor countries. Several actors that RFSL have spoken to are strongly critical of the withdrawal of developmental aid as a response to the situation, recognizing that such actions are problematic in many ways and could even make things worse, not only for LGBTQ people but others whose lives benefit from aid.

Additionally, there could be even more retaliation against the LGBTQ community if the reduction of aid is directly linked to LGBTQ rights and people. Political leaders, the general public, and other civil society organisations could shoulder the blame on LGBTQ people, and accuse them of being the reason for the reduction in aid.

The withdrawal of aid could also increase diplomatic tensions between Tanzania and other countries, jeopardizing opportunities for engagement in constructive dialogue and potential avenues of positive diplomatic influence.  Furthermore, this response may also harm other human rights defenders and civil society organizations that receive aid and support.

Before any steps are taken in relation to Sweden’s decision on how to structure aid to Tanzania, it is vital to consult with local activists and organisations to fully understand the consequences of such actions to the LGBTQ community. Consideration should also be given to how best to direct aid and assistance so that human rights defenders are prioritized and can continue their work in the country.

Related articles:



Written by Colin Stewart

Colin Stewart is a 45-year journalism veteran living in Southern California. He is the president of the St. Paul’s Foundation for International Reconciliation, which supports LGBTQ+ rights advocacy journalism, Erasing 76 Crimes. Contact him at [email protected]


Leave a Reply
  1. Indeed, why send aid to a country that fights the values and norms, even the laws of the countries that the aid is coming from? The claim by some that by cutting the aid to those anti-equal countries would endager the homosexual ppl living there might be a valid claim, BUT cutting off aid and any other support can also bring awareness into those anti-equality countries that they are watched, and kicked out of very profitable enterprises! Especially when international companies get involved! And they get invovled! Several companies have already ended contracts, or have included in the contracts with those anti-equality countries provisions that equality must be included on at least their plants! Anti-homosexuality should be regarded as the Apartheid of the 21st century I think! Decent countries do not support Apartheid, only stinking rotting countries support Apartheid!

Leave a Reply to Master Adrian Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Men hide their faces at a press conference in 2017 in Indonesia after being caught in a police raid on a gay sauna in Jakarta. (Photo courtesy of Southeast Asia Globe)

As AIDS rises in Indonesia, coalition urges LGBTI vigilance

Forgive Kevin Hart and other formerly anti-gay converts