Putin pushes ‘Straight Pride’ as a geopolitical power play
Colin Stewart is a 45-year journalism veteran living in Southern…
Activist Kyle James Rohrich analyzes the geopolitical tactics behind Russian President Vladimir Putin’s so-called “straight pride” initiative. Excerpts from his article “The Geopolitics of Intolerance: Putin’s ‘Straight Pride’ “:
By Kyle James Rohrich
In response to the United States’ recent Supreme Court ruling to make marriage equality law of the land, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “United Russia” party offered their rebuttal by unveiling a so-called “straight pride” flag depicting a man and a woman with three children. Per this “traditional values” ideology, the very existence of sexual minorities is a threat to what social conservatives depict as the Russian “traditional” family.
“Straight pride” is a new element of Putin’s increasingly prominent “traditional values” narrative, a conservative credo that Putin seeks to establish as his government’s new ideology aiming at both the Russians and anti-Western or conservative sympathizers abroad. As Russia’s first consistent political narrative since the fall of the Soviet Union, “traditional values” sells well to an increasingly religious populace suffering among other things from a national identity crisis for most of its post-Soviet existence.
Toward establishing a new national narrative, Russian leadership has marginalized a variety of identity groups to rile popular support: Central Asian migrants, feminists, and Euro-sympathizers. However, Putin pulled a winning ticket by putting LGBTI rights in the center of Russia’s new ideological crusade. By taking a stance for so-called “traditional values” in an era where Western governments began to lobby for LGBTI rights internationally, Putin doubled the gains on his political capital. Not only did he garner support of social conservatives opposed to LGBTI rights, but also he rallied Russia’s anti-American base by casting American LGBTI rights promotion as a form of cultural imperialism responsible for “regression, barbarity, and extensive bloodshed.” … With Russians fearing a return to instability of the tumultuous decade following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Putin’s message rang loud and clear.
Since Putin adopted the “traditional values” doctrine in 2013, he has promoted the ideology beyond the borders of the Russian Federation to pull homophobic populations into Russia’s geopolitical orbit. In this “World War LGBT,” Putin uses Russia’s newfound “traditional values” ideology instrumentally to rally grassroots support particularly in those countries he views as part of the country’s “near abroad”—namely, the former communist bloc of Eastern Europe and Eurasia.
As Ukrainians flocked to Kyiv’s Maidan Square to protest in 2013, Putin referred to the scene as the “Gayeuromaidan,” fusing the concepts of “gay” and “European” in the minds of Ukrainians who may be sympathetic to Europe but oppose LGBTI rights.
More recently, Putin has targeted the citizenship of Moldova, a former Soviet republic that signed an Association Agreement with the EU in 2014. In this religious and conservative country, Russian propaganda has suggested that Moldova’s continued orientation toward Europe would among other things “turn everyone gay.” …
As hetero-nationalists and social conservatives lash out against LGBTI rights from Kyrgyzstan to Turkey, Putin’s political party unveiled a “straight pride” flag as yet another attempt to legitimize his claim that Russia is a beacon of “traditional values”, a counter-ideology to Western liberalism.
However, Russia has among the world’s highest rates of abortions, divorces, and single parenthood; the “modern family” depicted on United Russia’s straight pride flag would be more accurately represented by a single mother with one child as opposed to a full nuclear family. This discrepancy between real and ideal demonstrates that Putin and his followers are not actually out to defend anything. For Putin, “straight pride” and “traditional values” are smoke and mirrors for more important goals, including building a Russian-led counterweight to Europe at the expense of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex people caught in the geopolitical crossfire.
Kyle James Rohrich is the founder and executive director/editor-in-chief of “Propaganda,” an online initiative to strengthen cohesion among activists promoting LGBTI human rights in Europe and Asia.
For more information, read the full article in the Equality Blog.
Related articles
- Russia’s Ruling Party Unveils Anti-Gay “Heterosexual Flag” (hyperallergic.com)
- More from the Equality Blog
- Kyrgyzstan to vote on ‘gay propaganda’ ban (76crimes.com)
- A victory for Russian defender of LGBT teens (76crimes.com)
- Russian LGBTI rights worker arrested, labeled ‘extremist’ (76crimes.com)
- Court ruling: Russian LGBT group is ‘foreign agent’ (76crimes.com)
It’s called traditional Nazi scapegoating of the usual designated groups of innocent individuals, especially LGBTI’s, to cover up the massive wealth and power greed and theft that Putin and his loyal filthy-rich oligarchy are actually engaged in. Turns out the German Nazis lost the war but won the peace in Russia, and they are coming close to doing the same in the US .
Reblogged this on Fairy JerBear's Queer World News, Views & More From The City Different – Santa Fe, NM and commented:
I’m not sure which version of Put in is worse the politician with personal animosity toward LGBTQ people or the politician who has no personal problem with homosexuality but is more than willing to play the traditional values card to capitalize on the homophobia and transphobia among the Russian citizenry and that of social conservatives elsewhere in the world. It may be both of these profiles are correct although I lean toward the second, political opportunist version. I have no doubt that many in government are homophobic it’s just that I get a politically conniving vibe from Putin. Either way the end result is a less tolerant Russia.
Reblogged this on franiel32.