HRAPF logo
Human rights workers have been seeking the release of two Ugandans who face trial starting May 7 on homosexuality charges. The case of Kim Mukisa and Jackson Mukasa, was reported in the article “2 Ugandans face trial on gay-sex charges.”
The advocacy group Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum — Uganda (HRAPF) has provided the defendants with lawyers who have tried to arrange their release on bail, so far unsuccessfully.
Adrian Jjuuko, executive director of HRAPF, released this description of the events in the case so far:
I have got many inquiries about this case, and since HRAPF’s lawyers have been representing the two since they were arrested, I would like to make a few comments in order to give the whole story behind the continued incarceration of the two.
It is true that Kim Mukisa and Jackson Mukasa were arrested and charged with ‘carnal knowledge against the order of nature’ and ‘permitting a male person to have carnal knowledge of oneself against the order of nature’ contrary to Section 145(a) and (c) of the Penal Code Act — not under the Anti Homosexuality Act 2014. This was on January 27th and 28th 2014 and not December 2013 as alleged in the article [in The Guardian].
The first one Kim Mukisa was being beaten up by a mob when HRAPF intervened. Jackson had complained to the local officials that Kim was ‘sodomising’ him. They were arrested separately.
Luzira Prison, where Kim Mukisa and Jackson Mukasa are being held. (Photo courtesy of Monitor.ug)
They were held in detention for more than 48 hours, and on 3rd February 2014 we wrote a letter to the Police complaining about the violation of their rights. We copied in the Divisional Police Commander, the Inspector General of Police, and Uganda Human Rights Commission.
We also applied for the an unconditional release order for them to be released from custody. They were hurriedly taken to court as soon as the letter was delivered. They were remanded to prison until 21st February 2014.
An application for a production warrant was rejected and on their next appearance in court on 21st February 2014, bail was applied for. However, there was only one surety — Jackson’s father. Bail was denied because of the lack of sureties. The matter was stood over for four hours to allow sureties to come, but to no avail.
They were taken back to prison and appeared again in court on 10th March and still there were no sureties for Kim and only one for Jackson. The Court once again denied them bail on this basis. They case was adjourned to 25th of March.
Meanwhile the lawyers implored with the accused persons and Jackson’s father to get another surety, and also the lawyers convinced one community member to stand surety for Kim. All the other attempts to get sureties failed.
On 25th March, the lawyers applied for bail which was granted on the following conditions:
i) A deposit of Uganda Shillings 300,000 cash as bail money each.
ii) Uganda Shillings 2,000,000 not cash for sureties.
iii) Introduction letters of the accused from the respective Local Council Chairpersons with the photographs of the accused persons accused.
The cash bail was paid by HRAPF. The Local Council letter was brought for Jackson but that for Kim was not secured since the Local Council chairperson denied knowing Kim.
However, the second surety for Jackson did not return to court to sign the Bond forms and all attempts to reach him by the lawyers and Jackson’s father were futile. His phones were off and he also refused to pick the calls after that. As such both were returned to prison and the case adjourned for 16th of April for mention.
Meanwhile attempts to get sureties for Kim failed and attempts to reach Jackson’s other surety were still futile.
On 16th April, the lawyer asked the magistrate to allow for a new surety of Jackson, but the magistrate refused and demanded for the old surety. For Kim, there was one surety who was accepted but the absence of the LC letter ensured that he was not released. This is the stage at which the newspaper article was published.
The State intimated that they were ready to proceed and suggested 7th May for the trial. This date was accepted by our lawyers, and the accused remanded until then. It is an unfortunate development, but not unknown for LGBTI persons, as people are really willing to stand surety for them. In fact we had represented Jackson before but he skipped bail and the sureties were unwilling to stand surety for him again.
Today, we managed to get in touch with Jackson’s other surety but the court refused to issue a production warrant until 7th May.
So right now, we are preparing for the trial, which if indeed it takes off will be the first one recorded in the history of Section 145 for consensual same sex relations.
Related articles
- Two more arrests of allegedly gay Ugandans (76crimes.com)
- 2 Ugandans face trial on gay-sex charges (76crimes.com)
- Ugandan LGBT leader Sam Ganafa out on bail (76crimes.com)
- Uganda’s anti-gay law faces court challenge (76crimes.com)
Civil Rights worker seeks an end to anti-gay hatred in Africa
The Rev. Gilbert H. Caldwell (Photo courtesy of BU.edu)
The Rev. Gilbert H. Caldwell, an African-American former Civil Rights activist and a retired United Methodist minister, responded with passion to the recent commentary by South African Justice Edwin Cameron, who bemoaned the repression of LGBT people in Africa.
In a commentary titled, “The Sexual Minority of Africa Should Also Be Heard,” Cameron wrote that “A destructive wave of hatred against lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender persons seems to be gaining force across Africa.”
Caldwell described his “deep agony” over mistreatment of LGBT people in parts of Africa and asked, “Why then would Africans in Africa … mistreat persons because of their sexual orientation in some of the ways we were once treated because of our race?”
This is Caldwell’s full response to Cameron’s commentary:
Edwin Cameron (Photo de Wikimedia Commons)
I respond with appreciation for Justice Cameron’s words for the following reasons:
1. I am a veteran “foot soldier” in the American Civil Rights Movement that Martin Luther King led. He and I are graduates of Boston University School of Theology where I met him in 1958.
2. I attended the 1963 March on Washington where Dr. King delivered his “I Have a Dream” speech, participated in “Mississippi Freedom Summer” when three young civil rights volunteers were killed, and I marched in the Selma to Montgomery March after the infamous “Bloody Sunday.”
3. I am an African-American who made my first trip to Africa in 1971 believing that Africa was the “Motherland” of those of us who represented the African Diaspora in America.
4. East Africa is viewed as the “Motherland” of all human beings and because of that
I have said over and over again, all human beings are “An African People.”
It is with a sense of deep agony that I read of the mistreatment of LGBT persons in some
of the nations of Africa. And, my prayer is that what Justice Cameron describes as a
“groundswell of hate” will soon be ended. My reasons:
The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. (Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons/Library of Congress)
1. Martin Luther King said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” How strange, peculiar and tragic it is that African nations that have known the injustices of colonialism that prompted successful independence struggles are now
engaging in acts of injustice directed at persons because of their homosexual orientation and practice. This contradicts the words that were spoken to justify the struggles for African Independence.
2. We who are Christians have just completed our observances and celebrations of Easter. We celebrated the life, mission and ministry of Jesus Christ who lived and died on behalf of ALL of God’s children. The Scriptures tell us of how Jesus wept over Jerusalem. Today, Jesus must be weeping over those nations in Africa where God-created and loved people are being persecuted because of their sexual orientation. Christians who engage in this persecution, or who are silent as it takes place, diminish the power of the Resurrection that we celebrated on Easter!
3. My wife and I are the grandparents of one grandchild, who is 9 years old. We do not know what her sexual orientation will be, but regardless of what it might be, how can we explain to her the wave of hatred that Justice Cameron describes?
4. When I first traveled to Africa in 1971 (Tanzania), I rejoiced in the sense of respect, community, togetherness and family that I experienced there. I realized that the poverty that exists in the USA represented plenty when compared to the poverty that exists in Africa. I came back to the USA and shared with my Black congregation that I saw hope and love and commitment in Africa, despite the poverty, that should inspire us amidst the poverty of our inner cities. But, what can I say to African-American Churches about the legally sanctioned hatred against gays in some African nations that is taking place today?
5. We in the African-American community in the USA sing a sing that is titled; “Lift Every Voice and Sing.” Some describe it as our National Anthem because it
describes the journey of African-Americans in the USA with these words: “We have
come over a way that with tears has been watered; we have come, treading our path through the blood of the slaughtered.”
The journey of Africans in Africa or Africans in America has not been an easy journey.
Why then would Africans in Africa, or African-Americans, mistreat persons because of their sexual orientation in some of the ways we were once treated because of our race?
– The Rev. Gilbert H. Caldwell
Retired United Methodist Minister
Co-Partner in Truth in Progress and
A Board Member of PFLAG (Parents, Family and Friends of Lesbians and Gays)
One of the African-American clergymen in the film “Love Heals Homophobia”
Asbury Park, New Jersey, U.S.A.
Related articles
Share this:
Like this: